检索结果相关分组
- 北宋教育改革家王安石
- 作者：詹凌霄 来源：抚州师专学报(综合版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 北宋 改革教育 教育改革 上智 下愚 培养人才 天才论 士子 政治革新家
- 描述：为“中国十一世纪时的改革家”。
- 也谈王安石的《明妃曲》
- 作者：高洪奎 来源：齐鲁学刊 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 周本淳 汉元帝 匈奴列传 北宋 黄金 欧阳修 王昭君 胡人 古代诗歌
- 描述：位提出了自己的看法,其用意是好的。但是,却有凭空拔高之嫌,特提出来进行商讨。现在先看王安石《明妃曲》原诗:
- 王安石与梅尧臣唱和农具诗
- 作者：王永厚 来源：农业考古 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 梅尧臣 生产工具 农具 宋代 思想家 参知政事 农业 歌咏 劳动人民
- 描述：思想家、诗人。神宗时任参知政事,后擢升宰相。他在从政时,积极推行新法,后因遭保守派反对而失
- 王安石《泊船瓜洲》写作时间辨
- 作者：张建营 来源：徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 泊船 南京市 江宁 写作时间 相位 注家 熙宁 作品 第二次
- 描述： 《泊船瓜洲》一诗写于何时,说法不一大多数注家认为是王安石第一次辞相后赴江宁(今南京市)路经瓜洲时写的.我认为此说不能成立,应是他第二次为相时的作品.熙宁七年(1047年)四月,王安石第一次辞去相位
- 浅探王安石教育思想的哲学基础
- 作者：吴云生 来源：抚州师专学报(综合版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 浅探 哲学基础 教育思想 情性观 性三品 上智 下愚 万物 圣人
- 描述： 王安石作为“中国十一世纪的改革家”,虽然一生未从事过职业的教育实践活动,但他从实行社会政治改革的需要出发,高度重视教育的作用。教育改革的思想是荆公新学的一个重要组成部分。
- 从《上仁宗皇帝言事书》看王安石的人才政策--兼论王安石人才
- 作者：白自东 来源：西藏民族学院学报 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 人才政策 王临川 人才思想 变法派 吕惠卿 反对派 欧阳修 人才问题 王安石变法
- 描述：王安石的人才政策是他一生政治思想与政治活动的重要组成部分,是一个丰富的历史宝库。从这个宝库里,我们可以得到许多有价值的东西;可以吸取很多的积极思想和历史经验。其中许多精辟的见解和论述
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
- 应是“柳三变”
- 作者：全展 来源：读书杂志 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 欧阳修 三变 中央广播电视大学 文学概论 二阶段 灵感 出版社 宋词 作者 柳永
- 描述：(即奉旨填词柳三变),而并非欧阳修。原词《凤栖梧》(即《蝶恋花》)是这样的: